Re: total db lockup
От | Eugene |
---|---|
Тема | Re: total db lockup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050819163958.DCVG1858.tomts39-srv.bellnexxia.net@[209.226.175.82] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | total db lockup (<eugene1@sympatico.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
actually, I'm using postgresql 7.3.2. I noticed there were some hash index fixes in 7.4, so that might be it. Would therebe any other reason for this deadlock? This database has been in production for almost 2 years and this is the firsttime we've seen the problem. thanks, Eugene > > From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> > Date: 2005/08/19 Fri AM 11:22:04 EST > To: Eugene <eugene1@sympatico.ca> > CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] total db lockup > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:54:35AM -0400, Eugene wrote: > > Thanks Alvaro. > > > > Here it is again: > > > > problem description: http://rafb.net/paste/results/bLAtIk26.html > > db state before first restart: http://rafb.net/paste/results/D1Bqe125.html > > db state before second restart: http://rafb.net/paste/results/D1Bqe125.html > > table definition: http://rafb.net/paste/results/W35ccD49.html > > Ok, so it seems the lockup occured only with the hash indexes? Then it > means we still have bugs in the locking code for those. It doesn't > surprise me. There's a reason they are not recommended, you know? > > Let us know if you find the problem showing up again with btree indexes. > The hash indexes bugs should be fixed, but they are not high priority ... > > -- > Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>) > "If it wasn't for my companion, I believe I'd be having > the time of my life" (John Dunbar) >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: